The method, in bullet point: For the worst sites, we noticed that we got roughly the same amount of replies as we did on the best sites, but the ratio of dates set up to replies was much lower, and the ratio of dates we set up to dates we actually went on was also considerably lower.On some of these sites, we never actually met any girls, which strongly indicates to us, that there aren’t any real women on the site.You have any idea how annoying it is to wait around for a girl who set up a date with you that never had any intention of showing up?Anyway, we went through that so you never had to find out the hard way that these sites do not deliver on the service that they claim to deliver.All you really need is a hundred or so images of women, which you can find anywhere on the net, and then you can create hundreds of fake profiles, manned by company employees, chatbots, or sometimes even cam girls, and you can deceive people into believing they’re talking to real women who are interested in casual dating, when they’re only talking to someone who is trying to trick them into paying for a premium membership that will never deliver the service it promises to deliver.
They’ll bury clauses in the terms of service that exonerate them for using deceptive practices, and this insulates them legally against the possibility of being held liable.
Now of course, not every girl shows up for every single date, but a very low ratio of dates set up to dates actually had is a strong indication that you’ve been played in the worst possible way.
The thing is, these sites don’t really care if you know you’ve got scammed or not.
Along with key review factors, this compensation may impact how and where sites appear on the page (including, for example, the order in which they appear).
Dating does not include listings for all dating sites.